The Content Maker

April 11th, 2008

Good News?

Posted by admin in Universe Of Investment

As the man said, “I’ve got some good news and I’ve got some bad news. What do you want to hear first?” It was replied, “Tell me the good news first”. The good news is that they are going to make some changes in the mutual fund industry reporting to help the investor and the bad news is it isn’t going to make any difference in your bottom line.

It seems that us small investors are getting the usual window dressing to make it seem that we are getting a good deal, but when you go in the store to try on the merchandise it still doesn’t fit any better.

Here is what the Securities and Exchange Commission passed as a new regulation for registered mutual funds. Instead of 50% of the Board of Directors being from outside the company they now must select 75% from outside the company. Can anyone tell me what difference that is going to make? The guys who own the fund will pick people who are friendly to their goals. Will they care any more for the investors than they do now? Window dressing.

One new regulation I do agree should help a little (but very little) is the requirement to provide more information to shareholders about their contracts with investment advisors and how they are approved. Big deal. The mutual fund industry said this will raise their costs. How? They have the information. All they have to do is add it to their prospectus. Also remember that the prospectus was written for the Dilbert lawyers at the SEC to meet the regulations and not to give you understandable information.

Do you remember what happened to your funds from 2000 to 2003? Most investors lost from 40% to 60% of their money. Let’s hope they don’t hire back those same analysts again, but they probably will. Just their contracts will be different. It is doubtful their results will change.

Furthermore these new fantastic, wonderful rules (sic) will not go into effect for 18 months. I guess as one of the 95 million mutual fund owners I will have to wait, but I’m not going to hold my breath.

What I did not hear from the SEC was that mutual fund managers should be paid on performance of how well they do with your money. Now they get paid by how much money they have or can get and keep in the fund. Sounds backwards to me. See if you can get your broker to refund all commissions if your fund does not make money. Don’t hold your breath on this one either.

Eighteen months from now investors are going to feel a lot better when all that good news goes into effect. Yeah.

Al Thomas - EzineArticles Expert Author

Al Thomas’ book, “If It Doesn’t Go Up, Don’t Buy
It!” has helped thousands of people make money
and keep their profits with his simple 2-step
method. Read the first chapter at
http://www.mutualfundmagic.com
and discover why he’s the man that Wall Street
does not want you to know.

Copyright 2005

April 5th, 2008

Key Point in Protective Put Strategy.

Posted by admin in Universe Of Investment

Key Point - The protective put strategy, when used correctly,
will allow investors to take advantage of some opportunities
that could provide large potential gains without being exposed
to the severe risks that normally accompany such risky
opportunities. With the proper protection in place, the investor
can profit from aggressive upside moves in the stock while
having a fixed, limited loss.

As stated before, this strategy is not going to work all the
time. However, there are some especially favorable opportunities
for implementing the protective put strategy.

One is the case of a stock in the process of a steep decline.
Quite often, stocks experience bad news or break down through a
technical support level and trade down to seek a new, lower
trading range.

Everyone wants to find the bottom to buy and go long, catching
the technical rebound, or to start accumulating the stock at
lower levels for the longer term.

Although this scenario sounds good, these types of trades are
risky. The risk is in identifying the true bottom. A stock that
is in a freefall or rapid decline might give a false indication
of a bottom which could lead to substantial losses. The
protective put will provide protection against this kind of
substantial loss.

A stock that goes through a freefall finally “exhausts” or works
through the sellers. The stock proceeds down to lower levels
where sellers are no longer interested in selling the stock.

At this level, the stock consolidates and buyers move in.
Because the sellers are now done (exhausted) the pressure is
lifted from the stock and it proceeds up as buyers out-number
sellers.

There are models that are used to calculate where this bottom
may lie, commonly referred to as “exhaustion models.” The
problem is that the stock, on the way down, may stop and give
the appearance of exhaustion but then continue further down. If
you had bought at the false appearance of exhaustion, you could
be looking at a big loss.

There is a potential for a very big reward if you pick the
“right” bottom. However, with the big potential gain comes the
big potential loss that is common in these types of risk/reward
scenarios. Here is a perfect opportunity to employ the
protective put strategy!

Remember, the protective put allows for a large potential upside
with a limited, fixed downside risk. If you feel that the stock
has bottomed out and is starting to consolidate, you purchase
the stock and purchase the put.

If you are right, and the stock runs back up, the stock profit
will well exceed the price paid for the put. Once the stock
trades back up, consolidates, and develops its new trading
range, the need for the protective put is over. At this time, if
you still like the stock and want to hold on to the long
position, you could always start selling calls against it.

Use the formula for maximum loss discussed earlier. Calculate
the loss in the stock and the amount you paid for the put and
add them together for your maximum loss in this position. The
protective put has limited your loss.

Maximum Loss = (Stock Price - Strike Price) - Option Price

This protection will save you enough money when you pick a false
(wrong) bottom that you may, if you like, try to pick the bottom
again at a lower point. The exhaustion scenario, as described
here, is a perfect opportunity to apply the protective put
strategy.

As seen with the exhaustion example, the protective put strategy
is best used in situations where the stock has a potential for
an aggressive upside move and the chance of a big downside move.

Another potential opportunity for using the protective put is in
combination with Technical Analysis. Technical Analysis is the
study of charts, indicators oscillators, etc. Charting has
proven to be more than reasonably accurate in forecasting future
stock movements.

Stocks travel in cycles that can and do form repetitious
patterns. These patterns are predictable and detectable by the
use of any number of charts, indicators and oscillators.

Although there are many, many forms and styles of technical
analysis, they all have several similarities. The one we want to
focus on is the technical “break-out.” A break-out is described
as a movement of the stock where its price trades quickly
through and beyond an obvious “technical resistance” or
resistance point.

For a bullish breakout, this level is at the very top of its
present trading range. Once through that level, the stock is
considered to have “broken out” of its trading range and will
now often trade higher, and establish a new higher trading
range.

The “break-out” is normally a rapid, large upward movement that
usually offers an outstanding potential return if identified
properly and acted upon in a timely fashion. However, if the
break-out fails, the stock could trade back down to the bottom
of the previous trading range.

If this were to happen, you would have incurred a large loss
because you would have bought at the upper end of the previous
trading range. As you can see the “break-out” scenario is an
opportunity that has large potential rewards but can on
occasion, have a large downside risk.

Therefore, this is an excellent scenario for application of the
protective put strategy.

For example, XYZ is presently at the top of a trading range with
the upper end of the range being $66.00 and the bottom end of
the range being $58.00. When the chart, indicator, or oscillator
you are using identifies the break-out of the stock (when it
trades through $66.00), you would buy the stock immediately.

The risk of the stock not following through with its breakout is
not large but it does happen. The stock could trade back down to
$58.00 which is the bottom of the trading range. If you had
bought the stock naked above $66.00, you would realize a minimum
$8.00 loss.

However, if you were to apply a protective put strategy with the
stock purchase, you can drastically limit your downside
exposure. For instance, say you were to buy the 65 strike put
for $2.00. If the stock trades up to $75.00, you would make
$9.00 if done naked but only make $7.00 if done with the
protective put.

This difference is the cost of the put. This $2.00 investment is
more than worth it should the stock go down. If the break-out
turns out to be a “false” break-out and the stock reverses and
trades down, your 65 put will allow you to sell your stock out
at $65.00 minus the $2.00 you paid for the put. This limits your
loss to $3.00 instead of a potential $8.00 loss. This is a much
better risk/reward scenario.

Amazing Options Trading Strategies For Safer Investing
and Explosive Profits. Discover how to protect your
investments with the leveraged power of options. Step
by step video tutorials show you how. Click here now:
http://www.options-university.com

Next Entries »